latent state
Identification of Gaussian Process State Space Models
The Gaussian process state space model (GPSSM) is a non-linear dynamical system, where unknown transition and/or measurement mappings are described by GPs. Most research in GPSSMs has focussed on the state estimation problem, i.e., computing a posterior of the latent state given the model. However, the key challenge in GPSSMs has not been satisfactorily addressed yet: system identification, i.e., learning the model. To address this challenge, we impose a structured Gaussian variational posterior distribution over the latent states, which is parameterised by a recognition model in the form of a bi-directional recurrent neural network. Inference with this structure allows us to recover a posterior smoothed over sequences of data. We provide a practical algorithm for efficiently computing a lower bound on the marginal likelihood using the reparameterisation trick. This further allows for the use of arbitrary kernels within the GPSSM. We demonstrate that the learnt GPSSM can efficiently generate plausible future trajectories of the identified system after only observing a small number of episodes from the true system.
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
DreamSteerer: EnhancingSourceImageConditioned EditabilityusingPersonalizedDiffusionModels
However, such a solution often shows unsatisfactory editability on the source image. To address this, we propose DreamSteerer, a plug-in method for augmenting existing T2I personalization methods. Specifically, we enhance the source image conditioned editability of a personalized diffusion model via a novel Editability Driven Score Distillation (EDSD) objective. Moreover, we identify amodetrapping issuewithEDSD, andpropose amodeshifting regularization with spatial feature guided sampling to avoid such an issue.
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Rhode Island > Providence County > Providence (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Basel-City > Basel (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Health & Medicine (0.67)
- Information Technology (0.46)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.28)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.92)
- Africa > Senegal > Kolda Region > Kolda (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.92)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)